Essay, Research Paper: King`s Rebellion

Politics

Free Politics research papers were donated by our members/visitors and are presented free of charge for informational use only. The essay or term paper you are seeing on this page was not produced by our company and should not be considered a sample of our research/writing service. We are neither affiliated with the author of this essay nor responsible for its content. If you need high quality, fresh and competent research / writing done on the subject of Politics, use the professional writing service offered by our company.


"...A little rebellion now and then is a good thing...It is a medicine
necessary for the sound health of government." Thomas Jefferson Thoreau, a
transcendentalist from the mid 19th century and Martin Luther King Jr., the
Civil Rights movement leader of a century later both believed the necessity of
medicine for government. Although they showed disagreement of opinion on issues
regarding voting, both writers agreed on the necessity to reform the government
and the means of accomplishing it. In King's Letter from Birmingham Jail and
Thoreau's Civil Disobedience, both agreed on injustice of majority to rule over
minority, both resisted the government passively, and both wanted a better
government immediately. The majority is not necessarily right, but they have
always been the ones in power because they are the strongest and the most
influential. Therefore, all the laws are written by the majority, almost all are
in favor of the majority, and all are enforced by the majority. According to
King, a law drafted by the majority is only just when the minority are willing
to follow it. He wrote "An unjust law is a code that a numerical or power
majority group compels a minority group to obey but does not make binding on
itself" (2:475). In other words, if a law denies the right of the minority
or is inflicted upon the minority by force, then it is not a just law. Similar
opinions are shared by Thoreau, when he writes "But a government in which
the majority rule in all cases cannot be based on justice..."(1:1425). Both
agreed that if a law is unjust, it is the duty of the opposition to break the
law, and do what they believe to be right. Once a law is broken, the person must
be willing to accept the consequences, which may be the penalty of imprisonment.
Although laws may be unjust, but it must be respected regardless. King fears
that anarchy will result if laws are not respected; Thoreau describes that
rebellion will be the consequence if laws are not given respect. Consequently,
both chooses to passively resist the laws they believed that are against their
morals, and are prepared to accept imprisonment . The exercise of passive
resistance is the basis of the title of Thoreau's work, and King presents
several examples of "civil disobedience" in his letter, including the
Boston Tea Party. King not only exercises passive resistance, he also provides
the procedure to be followed for any nonviolent campaign. They are: collection
of the facts to determine whether injustice exist; negotiation;
self-purification; and direct action (2:471). He points out that he has gone
through all the steps, and direct action is what brought him to the Birmingham
Jail. Recognition of injustice and passive resistance described by both authors
is to point out the need of government reformation. Thoreau calls for a better
government, immediately, and points out that the fastest way to improve
government is to "let every man make know what kind of government would
command his respect, and that will be one step toward obtaining it"
(1:1425). King does not directly states the need to reform government, but
instead, he states the need to reform the existing social structure, which goes
hand in hand with governmental progress. He advocates social equality and racial
justice, believing "Anyone who lives inside the United States can never be
considered an outsider anywhere within its bounds" (2:471), and passively
fighting against unjust laws forced upon the minority. Even though Thoreau
agreed with King on the issues, he also made contradictory statements directly
against what he supported. He wrote "If the injustice is part of the
necessary friction of the machine of government, let it go, let it go..."
stating that if injustice was inevitable and helped to improve government, then
it was justified. Opposed to his passive resistance, he also justified bloodshed
as he stated "But even suppose blood should flow. Is there not a sort of
blood shed when the conscience is wounded?" (1:1432). As for improvements
to government, he believed "That government is best which governs not at
all" (1:1425). Thoreau's writing is vague, and mostly an appeal to the
intellect, which sharply contrasted with the writing of King, an appeal to the
emotion of the readers. Although both writing made similar points, they are also
a sharp contrast of the other and undoubtedly very unique.
0
0
Good or bad? How would you rate this essay?
Help other users to find the good and worthy free term papers and trash the bad ones.
Like this term paper? Vote & Promote so that others can find it

Get a Custom Paper on Politics:

Free papers will not meet the guidelines of your specific project. If you need a custom essay on Politics: , we can write you a high quality authentic essay. While free essays can be traced by Turnitin (plagiarism detection program), our custom written papers will pass any plagiarism test, guaranteed. Our writing service will save you time and grade.




Related essays:

0
0
Politics / Kosovo Conflict
The Balkans have been a very unstable region for hundreds of years. The reason for contention is because of ethnic origin and disputes of which race owns which land.. That is the reason for the dispu...
1784 views
0 comments
0
0
Politics / Kosovo Crisis
The tension in Kosovo has existed for centuries, dating back as far as 1389 when Serbs lost an epic battle to the Ottoman Turks in Kosovo. Not until 1912, more than 500 years later did the Serbs rega...
1955 views
0 comments
0
0
Politics / Kurdistan
Since the end of World War I, Kurdistan has been administered by five sovereign states, with the largest portions of the land being respectively in Turkey (43%), Iran (31%), Iraq (18%), Syria (6%) an...
1980 views
0 comments
0
0
Politics / Latin America
In attempting to establish the current state of development in Latin America, historical chronology serves as the foundation necessary for a comprehensively logical position. Latin American developme...
2232 views
0 comments
0
0
Dear Congressman, I am honored to be writing to you on such a significant topic of national concern. Average citizens are annoyed and just plain fatigued with the drugs and crime problems in America....
2900 views
0 comments