Essay, Research Paper: College Paper On World History

World History

Free World History research papers were donated by our members/visitors and are presented free of charge for informational use only. The essay or term paper you are seeing on this page was not produced by our company and should not be considered a sample of our research/writing service. We are neither affiliated with the author of this essay nor responsible for its content. If you need high quality, fresh and competent research / writing done on the subject of World History, use the professional writing service offered by our company.

In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Decius Brutus and Mark Antony, both Roman
Senators, eulogize Julius Caesar, each using a different technique and approach.
Brutus, in a somewhat arrogant, to the point, eulogy, attempts to sway the
people. He justifies conspiring against Caesar by stating that Caesar's ambition
would have hurt Rome. However, in Antony's eulogy, he focuses on Caesar's
positive traits, and cunningly disproves Brutus' justification for killing
Caesar. The fickle Romans waver between leaders, responding emotionally, rather
than intellectually, to the orators. Brutus seeks to explain why he conspired
against Caesar. He begins his speech with "Romans, countrymen ...",
appealing to their consciousness as citizens of Rome, who, he later says, will
benefit as freeman with Caesar's death. This shows that Brutus knows how to lure
the crowd, appealing to their better judgement as Romans. He declares that he is
an honorable man, and tells them that he will let them judge the validity of his
claims. That is, he will allow the truth to speak for itself. This encourages
the crowd to believe him, as an honorable man. He says that he wants them to
know the facts; "Censure me in your wisdom, and awake your senses that you
may the better judge." Sharing information with the people is flattering
and it almost guarantees acceptance. He gets their sympathy by saying that he
loved Caesar, daring the people to find anyone who loved Caesar more. Brutus
declares that he never wronged Caesar, that he cried for Caesar's love, was
happy for his greatness, honored him for his courage, but had to kill him
because of Caesar's ambition. He says that the reason for killing Caesar was his
great love for Rome. He justifies his actions by saying that he loved Caesar
but, "Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more." He
then asks rhetorically if the people would want to live their lives as slaves
under Caesar's rule or would they prefer to live as freemen with Caesar dead. To
anyone insulted by his speech he wonders if, as Romans who love their freedom,
they could be offended or reject what he, Brutus, says. He poses the question,
"Who is here so base that would be a bondman?" He stresses the point,
repeating the line, "If any, speak, for him have I offended." "I
pause for a reply.", allows them to respond to his rhetorical questions,
giving them an even greater sense that he cares about them and their opinions.
They can only respond, " None, Brutus, none." That is, none are
offended, they do not disagree or argue with his words or his actions. Mark
Antony's eulogy utilizes a different approach. He starts out by addressing the
crowd as "Friends" because he wants to come to them as a friend rather
than a ruler trying to gain power. He then says, "I come to bury Caesar,
not to praise him.", thus he can ease in praises of Caesar without the
crowd stopping him. He sounds very sincere when he says, "The noble Brutus
hath told you Caesar was ambitious.... For Brutus is an honorable man." He
repeats that statement three more times becoming increasingly sarcastic, saying
finally, "Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and sure he was an honorable
man." Since the people responded positively to Brutus' speech, Antony could
not insult Brutus' honesty in a direct manner. Yet, Antony disproves Caesar's
ambition with three examples. One is when he gave the ransom of captives to the
public treasury and not his own, another when he cried with the poor people, and
finally when he refused the kingship that Antony offered him, three times.
Anyone who was ambitious would never have done any such things. Antony says,
"I speak not to disprove what Brutus spoke." , but that is exactly
what he does. Antony is using a dramatic effect on the people, first by entering
on the stage with the body of Caesar, and at the end stating that his heart is
still with the body of Caesar, ending his speech weeping. In justifying Caesar
and disproving Brutus, the people see Antony as a potential successor to Caesar.
They are swayed to him by his dramatics, his underhanded way of making a point,
his repetition, and compelling proof of Caesar's concern. He is able to get the
people to question the rightness of killing Caesar. He has planted doubt in the
people's minds, in all areas except that he, Antony, is, "poor soul",
an honorable. The difference between the eulogies shows us the importance of
style of speech. Both try to appeal to the people, and both use repetition, but
Brutus takes a defensive approach, leaving the people to their own conclusions.
However, Antony takes a prosecuting approach against Brutus, so sneaky that it
is almost subliminal. Furthermore, Antony's examples give him an advantage over
Brutus because he backs up statements while Brutus leaves his statements more
open-ended. The people seem to find it easier to accept Antony, an emotional and
sincere speaker, than Brutus who appears arrogant and forceful.
Good or bad? How would you rate this essay?
Help other users to find the good and worthy free term papers and trash the bad ones.
Like this term paper? Vote & Promote so that others can find it

Get a Custom Paper on World History:

Free papers will not meet the guidelines of your specific project. If you need a custom essay on World History: , we can write you a high quality authentic essay. While free essays can be traced by Turnitin (plagiarism detection program), our custom written papers will pass any plagiarism test, guaranteed. Our writing service will save you time and grade.

Related essays:

The Balkans have been a very unstable region for hundreds of years. The reason for contention is because of ethnic origin and disputes of which race owns which land.. That is the reason for the disp...
The latter half of the twentieth century has been dominated by the Cold War and the actions and events surrounding it. During this period different alliances and treaties were formed and many of the...
The bombing of pearl harbor could have been avoided and many lives could have been saved if the united states didnít have over confidence in themselves, if the Americans would have kept better tract...
The reconstruction of the south was the period during and after the Civil War where several different groups in the government tried to solve the economic, political, and social problems that arose ...
You are the owner of a large ship. You sail around the world and trade goods with other countries. A French investor has agreed to pay for your next trip if you can bring back a profit and, hopefull...